Advertisement

Basilic vein transposition tailored as rescue procedure in a uremic difficult access patient with thrombophilia

Basilic vein transposition tailored as rescue procedure in a uremic difficult access patient with thrombophilia

J Vasc Access 2015; 16(1)

Article Type: LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Article Subject: Dialysis

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000306

Authors

Antonio Granata, Antonio Basile

Corresponding author

  • Antonio Granata
  • antonio.granata4@tin.it

Abstract

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: None.
Conflict of interest: None.

This article is available as full text PDF.

Dear Editor,

Vascular access is vital in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Several unlucky patients with thrombophilia often require multiple operations, and options for other access procedures become increasingly limited. Basilic vein transposition (BVT) offers vascular access in such difficult cases and is increasingly preferred over prosthetic grafts and central vein cannulation for decreasing the morbidity and costs of dialysis patients as highlighted in the KDIGO guidelines (1-2-3).

A 62-year-old woman was admitted with a diagnosis of chronic renal failure secondary to membranous glomerulonephritis. Her medical history was characterized by hypertension and right breast cancer treated by mastectomy without sign of recurrence on follow-up. She progressed to ESRD and regular thrice-weekly hemodialysis was started in July 2009 through a tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) in the right internal jugular vein. Two months later, a radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula over the left arm was created but suddenly thrombosed. Subsequently three attempts of arteriovenous fistula failed again. Then thrombophilia secondary to factor V Leiden mutation was discovered, and warfarin therapy was started. A polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft was therefore inserted between the basilic vein and brachial artery on the left forearm, under strict surveillance to reduce the incidence of other complications; however, the graft thrombosed after 2 years (Tab. I summarizes vascular access operations). A tunneled CVC was then implanted in the left jugular vein. Three months later she was admitted to the hospital for severe catheter-related bloodstream infection due to Staphylococcus aureus treated with vancomycin and catheter removal. When blood culture became sterile, a temporary CVC was placed in the left femoral vein. A venography was performed without signs of critical stenosis, then using the patient’s own vessel a BVT was tailored on the left arm as rescue procedure (discontinuing warfarin and starting on unfractionated heparin 2 days prior to the intervention). After the beginning of hemodialysis treatment an ischemic steal syndrome developed especially during dialysis session, manifested by cold hand, numbness, pain and swelling, then the use of BVT paused. The patient was scheduled for banding with partial improvement in the symptoms. The hand swelling with pain persisted and, suspecting a central venous stenosis, a new phlebography was performed showing steno-occlusion of the left truncus anonymous; collateral veins were also visible on clinical examination and patency of BVT (Fig. 1). One month later BVT was successfully used for hemodialysis.

Patient vascular access history

Year Vascular access Complication
CVC = central venous catheter; PTFE = polytetrafluoroethylene; CRBSI = Catheter-related bloodstream infection.
July 5, 2009 Temporary CVC in right femoral vein
July 17, 2009 Tunneled CVC in right internal jugular vein
From July 28, 2009 to August 8, 2009 Left radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula Never used, thrombosis
August 5, 2009 Right radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula Thrombosis
September 7, 2009 Right brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula Thrombosis
From June 9, 2010 to November 15, 2010 Left PTFE vascular graft Thrombosis
From November 15, 2010 to November 29, 2010 Temporary CVC in right internal jugular vein Jugular vein thrombosis
From November 30, 2010 to July 19, 2011 Tunneled CVC in left internal jugular vein
From May 3, 2011 to April 2013 PTFE vascular graft Three graft angioplasty, thrombosis
From April 2013 to September 15, 2013 Tunneled CVC in left jugular vein CRBSI
From September 19, 2013 to January 15, 2014 Temporary CVC in left femoral vein
From October 31, 2013 Basilic vein transposition on the left arm Steal syndrome—steno-occlusion of left truncus anonymous

An adequate preoperative evaluation with physical examination, duplex ultrasonography and angiography are the keystones to avoid complications in the difficult access patients. Although angiographic study performed before surgery showed no critical central vein stenosis, in our patient thrombosis of ipsilateral left truncus anonymous was completely unexpected. However, the development of collateral circuits visible on physical and angiographic examinations has led us to a successful salvage of BVT. This latter has been used in the presence of a slight hand swelling.

Our case demonstrates that in thrombophilic patients, previous central venous cannulations and systemic inflammatory status especially in the infectious setting may additionally increase the risk of thrombosis despite the patient undergoing anticoagulant therapy. This awareness may improve patency rates and may decrease the incidence of central vein thrombosis in difficult vascular access patients.

On physical exam prominent collateral veins are along the anterior chest wall and axilla (A). The same finding detected by angiography (B).

Disclosures

Financial support: None.
Conflict of interest: None.
References
  • 1. Glickman M. Basilic vein transposition: review of different techniques. J Vasc Access 2014; 15: S81-S84
  • 2. Agarwal A.,Mantell M.,Cohen R.,Yan Y.,Trerotola S.,Clark TW. Outcomes of single-stage compared to two-stage basilic vein transposition fistulae. Semin Dial 2014; 27: 298-302
  • 3. Morosetti M.,Cipriani S.,Dominijanni S.,Pisani G.,Frattarelli D.,Bruno F. Basilic vein transposition versus biosynthetic prosthesis as vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 1713-1719

Authors

  • Granata, Antonio [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, * Corresponding Author (antonio.granata4@tin.it)
  • Basile, Antonio [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2

Affiliations

  • Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, “St. Giovanni di Dio” Hospital, Agrigento - Italy
  • Radiolology Unit, “Garibaldi” Hospital, Catania - Italy

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.