Advertisement

Accessing totally implantable venous access systems on the day of placement does not significantly increase the risk of infection

Accessing totally implantable venous access systems on the day of placement does not significantly increase the risk of infection

forthcoming

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Article Subject: Interventional radiology

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000505

Authors

Young, Shamar J. Young, Linda J. Vogel, Jeffery Sutkowski, Raymond Venkataperumal, Satish

Abstract

Totally implantable venous access systems (ports) are commonly placed and have a low complication rate. The most common complication is infection, which can have very negative effects on patients resulting in hospitalization and/or treatment delay in the setting of neoplasm. While a number of variables have been studied in relation to diminishing infectious rates, one remaining question is the effect of accessing the port on day of placement, which is the aim of this retrospective study.

After internal review board approval the electronic medical records of 2,006 patients who underwent port placement between 10/1/2008 and 9/30/2013 were reviewed. Of these patients 628 were excluded as they did not have complete placement and removal data available, leaving 1378 patients in our cohort.

There was a significantly longer number of infection-free catheter days in the out-patient cohort as compared to the in-patient cohort (p = 0.027). In-patients mean day after placement when the port was first accessed (DAP) (0.5) was statistically earlier (closer to placement) than the out-patients DAP (7.2) (p<0.0001). However, the increased likelihood of infection could not be explained by DAP (p = 0.2029) even when controlling for in-patient and out-patient status (p = 0.97).

Accessing the port on the day of placement does not significantly contribute to an increased likelihood of infection. This study seems to indicate that placing a port on the first day of outpatient therapy likely optimally balances respect for patient time with infection control.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: None.
Conflict of interest: None.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Young, Shamar J. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, * Corresponding Author (yosham@radiology.ufl.edu)
  • Young, Linda J. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2
  • Vogel, Jeffery [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Sutkowski, Raymond [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Venkataperumal, Satish [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 3

Affiliations

  •  Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida - USA
  •  Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida - USA
  •  National Pain Institute, Lady Lake, Florida - USA

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.