Advertisement

Apparent migration of implantable port devices: normal variations in consideration of BMI

Apparent migration of implantable port devices: normal variations in consideration of BMI

forthcoming

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Article Subject: Oncology

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000502

Authors

Wyschkon, Sebastian Löschmann, Jan-Phillip Scheurig-Münkler, Christian Nagel, Sebastian Hamm, Bernd Elgeti, Thomas

Abstract

To evaluate the extent of normal variation in implantable port devices between supine fluoroscopy and upright chest x-ray in relation to body mass index (BMI) based on three different measurement methods.

Retrospectively, 80 patients with implanted central venous access port systems from 2012-01-01 until 2013-12-31 were analyzed. Three parameters (two quantitative and one semi-quantitative) were determined to assess port positions: projection of port capsule to anterior ribs (PCP) and intercostal spaces, ratio of extra- and intravascular catheter portions (EX/IV), normalized distance of catheter tip to carina (nCTCD). Changes were analyzed for males and females and normal-weight and overweight patients using analysis of variance with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparison.

PCP revealed significantly greater changes in chest x-rays in overweight women than in the other groups (p<0.001, F-test). EX/IV showed a significantly higher increase in overweight women than normal-weight women and men and overweight men (p<0.001). nCTCD showed a significantly greater increase in overweight women than overweight men (p = 0.0130). There were no significant differences between the other groups. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was high (Cronbach alpha of 0.923-1.0) and best for EX/IV.

Central venous port systems show wide normal variations in the projection of catheter tip and port capsule. In overweight women apparent catheter migration is significantly greater compared with normal-weight women and with men. The measurement of EX/IV and PCP are straightforward methods, quick to perform, and show higher reproducibility than measurement of catheter tip-to-carina distance.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: No financial support.
Conflict of interest:

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Wyschkon, Sebastian [PubMed] [Google Scholar] , * Corresponding Author (sebastian.wyschkon@charite.de)
  • Löschmann, Jan-Phillip [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheurig-Münkler, Christian [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel, Sebastian [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hamm, Bernd [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Elgeti, Thomas [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Affiliations

  • Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin - Germany

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.