Advertisement

Evaluation of the correct position of peripherally inserted central catheters: anatomical landmark vs. electrocardiographic technique

Evaluation of the correct position of peripherally inserted central catheters: anatomical landmark vs. electrocardiographic technique

J Vasc Access 2015; 16(5): 394 - 398

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000431

Authors

Francesco Baldinelli, Giuseppe Capozzoli, Roberta Pedrazzoli, Natascia Marzano

Corresponding author

  • Giuseppe Capozzoli
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Central Hospital of Bolzano
  • via L.Boehler 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
  • giuseppe.capozzoli@asbz.it

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify as early as possible the correct positioning of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tip in order to reduce complications due to possible malpositioning. The ECG-guided technique proved to be reliable, easy to carry out, straightforward, low-cost and allows us to recognize an incorrect or a suboptimal positioning throughout the procedure. The purpose of this study is to compare two methods used during the PICC insertion so as to prevent catheter malpositioning; the first study estimates the catheter length by the landmark method (based on cutaneous anatomical landmarks, CALs) with the addition of the postprocedural verification of tip location by chest X-Ray (CxR), whereas the second method of intraprocedural tip location is based on the observation of the morphological variations of the P wave (ECG-guided technique) with the addition of the postprocedural verification by CxR.

From 2010 to 2012, 90 PICCs were positioned, 48 using the anatomical landmarks and 42 using the ECG technique.

Twenty-five percent of the catheters positioned with the anatomical landmark technique did not reach the correct position of the tip in SVC; of these, 6.25% were placed in an aberrant position and others in a sub-optimal position.

Of the 42 PICCs positioned with the ECG technique, only in three cases (equal to 7.14%), a suboptimal position of the tip was observed, whereas there was no case of aberrant positioning.

The ECG technique represents an accurate, low-cost and safe technique to verify the correct positioning of the tip. The use of the ECG allowed a more correct positioning in terms of catheter tip-carina distance and catheter tip-tracheobronchial angle, and in no patient was it necessary to place a catheter again.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: The authors have no financial disclosures to make.
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Baldinelli, Francesco [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Capozzoli, Giuseppe [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, * Corresponding Author (giuseppe.capozzoli@asbz.it)
  • Pedrazzoli, Roberta [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Marzano, Natascia [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2

Affiliations

  • Department of Anesthesiology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano - Italy
  • Department of Oncology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano - Italy

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.