Advertisement

Patient survival following arteriovenous fistula formation

Patient survival following arteriovenous fistula formation

Post author correction

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Article Subject: Dialysis

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000343

Authors

Damian G McGrogan, Melanie A Field, Alexander P Maxwell, Yazin Marie, Nicholas G Inston

Corresponding author

  • Damian G McGrogan
  • Department of Vascular Access and Renal Transplantation
  • Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH
  • UK
  • damianmcg@gmail.com; damian.mcgrogan@uhb.nhs.uk

Abstract

Efforts to promote arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have been successful in increasing the prevalence of AVF use as the primary vascular access for haemodialysis (HD). Sustained preference for AVF use may not be the most appropriate vascular access choice for all patient groups. Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) offer advantages of earlier use and lower primary failure rates compared to AVFs so may be preferable for patients where short-term vascular access is needed. This study was designed to assess comparative mortality in different age groups following AVF formation.

A prospective cohort of patients having AVF creation was recruited. Patients were subdivided into three age groups: Group A: <50 years; Group B: 50-74 years and Group C: ≥75 years. Survival curves and Cox regression analysis were performed on each of these groups.

One hundred and thirty-four patients (n = 134) were recruited into the study. The prevalence of diabetes increased significantly with age. As expected, mortality was higher in older age groups (log rank (Mantel-Cox) 19.227; p = 0.0001). Mortality rates at 1 year were 0% in group A, 12.5% in group B and 29.1% in group C. Medium-term mortality at 4 years was 7.9% in group A, 39.1% in group B and 54.8% in group C.

We found a significantly higher mortality rate in patients ≥75 years in comparison to those <75 years. The choice of vascular access modality should be tailored to the individual with particular reference to the patient’s expected survival.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: None.
Conflict of interest: None to declare.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • McGrogan, Damian G [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, * Corresponding Author (damianmcg@gmail.com; damian.mcgrogan@uhb.nhs.uk)
  • Field, Melanie A [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Maxwell, Alexander P [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2, 3
  • Marie, Yazin [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Inston, Nicholas G [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1

Affiliations

  • Department of Vascular Access and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham - UK
  • Regional Nephrology Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland - UK
  • School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, Northern Ireland - UK

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.