Safety and efficacy of combined micropuncture and shallow angle femoral artery access for neurovascular angiography
Post author correction
Article Type: TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR ACCESS
Article Subject: Interventional radiology
DOI:10.5301/jva.5000388
Authors
Austin C. Bourgeois, Chris T. Kolze, Marcelo S. Guimaraes, Alexander S. Pasciak, Andrew S. Ferrell, Yong Bradley, Peter Kvamme
Corresponding author
- Austin C. Bourgeois
- Department of Radiology
- 1924 Alcoa Highway
- Knoxville, TN 37920, USA
- austincb@gmail.com
Abstract
The AXERA 2 low-angle vascular access device utilizes a dual arteriotomy mechanism in which the standard access tract is compressed by a vascular sheath inserted over the second, low-angle tract. It is unknown whether this device could be effectively used with 21-gauge micropuncture access, as the micropuncture introducer makes a larger arteriotomy than the 19-gauge needle provided with the AXERA 2 system.
A retrospective review was performed on 189 patients who underwent common femoral artery access for diagnostic cerebrovascular angiography using either combined micropuncture and AXERA 2 access or standard access with manual pressure hemostasis. Demographic and procedural data were reviewed along with complications related to vascular access and times to bed elevation, ambulation and discharge.
Combined micropuncture and AXERA 2 access was performed on 110 patients and 79 patients had standard access. The AXERA device was successfully used in 91.8% of the cases. Demographic data, anticoagulant use and sheath sizes were similar between both subsets. Use of the AXERA 2 was associated with two bleeding complications (1.8%) compared with 10 (12.7%) with manual pressure hemostasis alone. Institution-specific protocol allowed shorter mean manual compression time, as well as shorter times to ambulation and discharge with the AXERA 2.
Use of the AXERA 2 device with micropuncture access did not infer increased bleeding risk than standard arterial access in this patient series. The considerable incidence of device use failures suggests a learning curve associated with its use.
Article History
- • Accepted on 02/03/2015
- • Available online on 23/05/2015
Disclosures
This article is available as full text PDF.
Authors
- Bourgeois, Austin C. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, * Corresponding Author (austincb@gmail.com)
- Kolze, Chris T. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
- Guimaraes, Marcelo S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2
- Pasciak, Alexander S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 3
- Ferrell, Andrew S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 3
- Bradley, Yong [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 3
- Kvamme, Peter [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 3
Affiliations
- University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medical Education, Knoxville, TN - USA
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC - USA
- University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN - USA
Article usage statistics
The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.