Advertisement

Should patients be on antithrombotic medication for their first arteriovenous fistulae?

Should patients be on antithrombotic medication for their first arteriovenous fistulae?

forthcoming

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Article Subject: Dialysis

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000491

Authors

Murley, Alexander Wijewardane, Anika Wilmink, Teun Baharani, Jyoti

Abstract

Evidence on the effect of antithrombotic medication on reducing early and late fistula failure is inconclusive. Antithrombotic use carries risks in patients with end-stage renal failure and could increase the risk of needling complications as a result of bleeding. The objectives of this study are to determine the effect of antithrombotic agents on early and late fistula failure and on the risk of interrupted start of cannulation of the fistula.

Retrospective analysis of two prospectively maintained databases of access operations and dialysis sessions of 671 patients who had their first fistula between 2004 and 2011. Early failure was defined as failure to reach six consecutive dialysis sessions at any time with two needles on the index form of access. Fistula survival was defined as the time from when the fistula was first used to fistula abandonment.

Primary failure was similar between patients on antiplatelet (18.8%), anticoagulants (18.4%) or no antithrombotic medication (18.8%; p = 0.998). Antithrombotic medication did not have an effect on AVF survival (p = 0.86). Antithrombotic medication did not increase complicated cannulation rates, defined as the percentage of patients failing to achieve six uninterrupted dialysis sessions from the start (p = 0.929).

Antithrombotic medication had no significant effect on primary failure rate, long-term fistula survival or initial complicated cannulation rates in our study. This suggests that patients already on antithrombotic medication can continue taking them without increasing the risk of interrupted dialysis.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: The authors have no financial disclosures to make.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.
Meeting presentation: An abstract of results from this work has been displayed at the ERA-EDTA congress in Amsterdam 2014.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Murley, Alexander [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Wijewardane, Anika [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Wilmink, Teun [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2
  • Baharani, Jyoti [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, * Corresponding Author (Jyoti.Baharani@heartofengland.nhs.uk)

Affiliations

  • Department of Renal Medicine, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham - UK
  • Department of Vascular Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham - UK

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.