Advertisement

Use of biosynthetic grafts (Omniflow II) for high infection risk haemodialysis vascular access

Use of biosynthetic grafts (Omniflow II) for high infection risk haemodialysis vascular access

forthcoming

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Article Subject: Dialysis

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000462

Authors

Al Shakarchi, Julien McGrogan, Damian Yates, Philip J. Inston, Nicholas

Abstract

Infective complications of patients requiring insertion of arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis remain a challenge. In particular, patients who have exhausted autologous options and have had recent infective complications relating to alternative dialysis modalities such as peritonitis or central venous catheter-associated bacteremia can pose a significant dilemma. We present a series of challenging cases that represent examples of the use of biosynthetic grafts in patients with on-going infective risks. A review of available literature for the use of the Omniflow II graft in dialysis access is included.

Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the use of the Omniflow II graft for dialysis in accordance with PRISMA published up to 31st March 2014. The primary outcomes for this study were 1-year primary and secondary patency rates. Secondary outcomes were rates of infection and aneurysmal degeneration.

Three cases are described that were considered at high risk of infection and all successfully managed with the Omniflow II arteriovenous graft (AVG). None showed signs of infection and all grafts were patent at three months’ follow-up. On review of the literature and following strict criteria, four studies were included with a total of 236 procedures. We found that the one-year primary patency rate for Omniflow II AVGs was 60.1% (53.6-66.5) with a secondary patency rate of 82.1% (76.7-86.9). Infection rates are reported at 0% to 5.7%, with aneurysmal rates ranging between 0% and 6.8%.

This small series reports on the successful use of the Omniflow II graft in patients with high risk of infection and, whilst limited in its size and scientific design, it does support the limited existing literature for the potential benefits of the biosynthetic approach where concerns regarding infective complications of synthetic material exist.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: ReDVA has been supported by the EU FP7 IAAP funding.
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Al Shakarchi, Julien [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 2
  • McGrogan, Damian [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Yates, Philip J. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Inston, Nicholas [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 2, * Corresponding Author (Nicholas.Inston2@uhb.nhs.uk)

Affiliations

  • Department of Renal Surgery, QEHB, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham - UK
  • ReDVA Research Consortium, Dundee - UK

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.