Contents

for authors

Cart

quick search

Journal Info

  • Honorary Editor: Diego Brancaccio
  • Coordinating Editor: Maurizio Gallieni
  • Editor in Chief VAS: Jan Tordoir
  • Frequency: Quarterly
  • Current issue: Vol. 13 issue 4 , 2012 (October-December)

Contents

Cart

Your cart is empty

View cart

quick search

Vol. 13 Issue 3 (July-September)

A proposed management algorithm for fistulae between hemodialysis access circuits and adjacent veins

Article tools

A proposed management algorithm for fistulae between hemodialysis access circuits and adjacent veins

J Vasc Access 2012; 13(3): 374 - 380

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000061

Authors

Hannah R. Margoles, Richard D. Shlansky-Goldberg, Michael C. Soulen, Scott O. Trerotola

Abstract

Purpose: Fistulae between an arteriovenous hemodialysis graft (AVG) or fistula (AVF) and an adjacent vein are an unusual complication of hemodialysis access. Such fistulae may theoretically cause steal syndrome, extremity edema, or access dysfunction. We sought to use our experience and existing literature to develop a management algorithm for this access complication. Methods: Twelve patients with AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae found on fistulography were identified using a quality assurance database. Indications for fistulography, treatment rendered for both the fistulae and access stenosis, and outcome of treatment were determined. AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae, when identified and considered to be significant, were treated with embolization. Results: Five out of twelve patients had successful embolization of their AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae. Reasons for treatment included partial thrombosis of the access to the level of the fistula (n=1), contribution to bleeding during dialysis (n=1), and concern for competing flow causing thrombosis (n=5). No recurrence was identified. Seven patients did not undergo embolization either because of failure to recognize the fistula (n=3) or determination that treatment was not indicated (n=4). Two untreated fistulae were found occluded at follow-up. Additional access treatment included angioplasty (n=11), covered stent (n=1), and mechanical thrombectomy (n=3). Conclusions: The significance of AVG/AVF to adjacent vein fistulae remains unclear; some resolve spontaneously, possibly related to PTA of outflow stenosis. Embolotherapy is an effective treatment for such fistulae when determined to be significant.

Article History

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

Authors

  • Margoles, Hannah R. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    Department of Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Health System - USA
  • Shlansky-Goldberg, Richard D. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center - USA
  • Soulen, Michael C. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center - USA
  • Trerotola, Scott O. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center - USA

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal

    Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

    Article price: Eur 36,00

    You will need to register a new account (if you haven't already done so), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.

  • Claim online access

    If you hold a Society membership and you have never accessed the website claim online access to receive your log in credentials

No supplementary material is available for this article.